Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSeyis Kazazoğlu, Senemen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-16T15:06:59Z
dc.date.available2019-07-16T15:06:59Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-01
dc.identifier.citationSeyis, S. (2019). Pros and cons of using building information modeling in the AEC industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(8), 1-17. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001681en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-9364
dc.identifier.issn1943-7862
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11729/1651
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001681
dc.description.abstractAlthough a plethora of studies on building information modeling (BIM) have been conducted in the last decade, none of the previous studies collate and/or prioritize the benefits, risks, and challenges of BIM based on the data collected from a comprehensive literature review and subject matter experts (SMEs). In order to allow architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) professionals and academics see the true potential of BIM in a wider context and help them understand its multiorganizational and multidisciplinary functions, there is an obvious necessity for identifying, classifying, and prioritizing the pros and cons of BIM; however, such a study is still currently absent in the AEC literature. The aim of this study is to identify, classify, and rank the pros and cons of BIM that address the benefits, challenges, and risks of BIM in the transition from computer-aided design (CAD). A literature review was performed and face-to-face semistructured interviews with SMEs on BIM were conducted for identification and classification purposes. A total of 41 types of benefits, 11 types of risks, and 13 types of challenges of BIM were identified via triangulation of literature review and face-to-face semistructured interviews with SMEs. The Delphi method was performed for prioritizing the benefits of BIM in terms of time, cost, and sustainability as well as the risks and challenges of BIM encountered in the transition process from CAD to BIM. The interrater agreement and significance-level statistics were performed to analyze and validate the consensus reached by the Delphi panel experts. This paper contributes to the existing body of knowledge on BIM by providing comprehensive identification and classification of the benefits, challenges, and risks of BIM, and prioritization of the benefits for BIM in terms of time, cost, and sustainability as well as the risks and challenges of BIM. The priority rankings of benefits, risks, and challenges of BIM ensure successful completion of projects and create additional value by allowing professionals to make well-informed decisions that support decreasing time and cost-related waste in the transition process from CAD to BIM.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherASCE-AMER Soc Civil Engineersen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001681
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBuilding information modelingen_US
dc.subjectBenefits of building information modeling (BIM)en_US
dc.subjectChallenges of building information modeling (BIM)en_US
dc.subjectRisks of building information modeling (BIM)en_US
dc.subjectPros and cons of building information modeling (BIM)en_US
dc.subjectDelphi methoden_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectImpacten_US
dc.subjectToolen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectConstruction projectsen_US
dc.subjectDelphi surveyen_US
dc.subjectBIMen_US
dc.subjectDesignen_US
dc.subjectBenefitsen_US
dc.subjectImplementationen_US
dc.subjectBuilding information modelingen_US
dc.subjectBuildingsen_US
dc.subjectConstruction industryen_US
dc.subjectInformation modellingen_US
dc.subjectComputer aided designen_US
dc.subjectDecision makingen_US
dc.subjectInformation theoryen_US
dc.subjectSustainable developmenten_US
dc.subjectArchitecture , engineering , and constructionsen_US
dc.subjectBuilding information model - BIMen_US
dc.subjectInter-rater agreementsen_US
dc.subjectLiterature reviewsen_US
dc.subjectSemi structured interviewsen_US
dc.subjectSignificance levelsen_US
dc.subjectSubject matter expertsen_US
dc.subjectArchitectural designen_US
dc.titlePros and cons of using building information modeling in the AEC industryen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Construction Engineering and Managementen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIşık Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIşık University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-9133-9899
dc.identifier.volume145
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.endpage17
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorSeyis Kazazoğlu, Senemen_US
dc.relation.indexWOSen_US
dc.relation.indexScopusen_US
dc.relation.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)en_US
dc.relation.indexSocial Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)en_US
dc.description.qualityQ1
dc.description.wosidWOS:000471697700003


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster