Governance, institutions, and economic performance: a comparative study of Singapore and South Sudan

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-9952-6752
dc.authorid0009-0006-4383-2079
dc.contributor.authorParlak, Fatmanuren_US
dc.contributor.authorAktaş, Alperenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-09T11:18:32Z
dc.date.available2025-07-09T11:18:32Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-31
dc.departmentIşık Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümüen_US
dc.departmentIşık University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Relationsen_US
dc.description.abstractThe ongoing debate between democratic and nondemocratic systems has gained significant attention in contemporary political discourse. With the rise of authoritarian regimes, the long-standing assumption that democratic principles are prerequisites for economic development has been increasingly challenged. While some authoritarian regimes, such as China and Singapore, have demonstrated notable economic successes, others, like South Sudan, face persistent economic struggles. This divergence raises critical questions about the relationship between governance systems and economic outcomes. This study aims to address the following research question: How do governance structures, institutional capacities, and historical contexts influence economic development in authoritarian regimes? By employing the Most Similar Systems Design (MSSD), the study compares two contrasting authoritarian regimes: Singapore, an economically successful case, and South Sudan, an economically struggling one. The research incorporates a structural-historical approach to examine the factors that differentiate their economic trajectories, such as institutional efficiency, historical legacy, and policy decisions. The findings of this study contribute to the broader literature on authoritarianism and development by offering a nuanced understanding of how governance systems shape economic performance. In doing so, it challenges simplistic assumptions about authoritarian governance and highlights the complexities underlying economic success and failure.en_US
dc.description.versionPublisher's Versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationParlak, F. & Aktaş, A. (2024). Governance, institutions, and economic performance: a comparative study of Singapore and South Sudan. Journal of International Relations and Political Science Studies(12), 1-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.69494/jirps.1557876en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.69494/jirps.1557876
dc.identifier.endpage18
dc.identifier.issn2792-0984
dc.identifier.issue12
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11729/6544
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.69494/jirps.1557876
dc.indekslendigikaynakSobiaden_US
dc.institutionauthorParlak, Fatmanuren_US
dc.institutionauthorid0000-0002-9952-6752
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.publicationstatusPublisheden_US
dc.publisherUluslararası İlişkiler Çalışmaları Derneğien_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of International Relations and Political Science Studiesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectDemocracyen_US
dc.subjectAuthoritarian regimesen_US
dc.subjectEconomyen_US
dc.subjectSouth Sudanen_US
dc.subjectSingaporeen_US
dc.titleGovernance, institutions, and economic performance: a comparative study of Singapore and South Sudanen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublicationen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Governance_institutions_and_economic_performance_a_comparative_study_of_Singapore_and_South_Sudan.pdf
Boyut:
922.62 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Makale Koleksiyonu | Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü