2 sonuçlar
Arama Sonuçları
Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
Yayın The mediating role of schema modes in the relationship between parentification and codependency(SAGE Publications Inc., 2025-07) Ünver, Buket; Önürme, Güneş BeyzaThe aim of this study is to examine the mediating role of schema modes between parentification in different roles and codependency. The sample of the study consists of 599 Turkish women aged between 18 and 64. Firstly, Pearson correlation analysis was conducted, revealing that most of the variables were significantly correlated. Secondly, mediating analysis was performed. The results showed that vulnerable child, angry child, compliant surrender, and demanding parent modes mediated the relationship between parent-focused parentification and codependency. The relationship between sibling-focused parentification and codependency was found to be mediated by the happy child, punitive parent, and demanding parent mode. These findings indicate that parentification in different roles are associated with codependency in women through distinct schema modes, with the exception of the demanding parent mode, which appeared in both paths. Furthermore, the results highlight that disruptions in the hierarchical structure of the early parent-child relationship shapes emotional and cognitive structures in adulthood, potentially contributing to the development of dysfunctional relationship dynamics.Yayın Development and validation of a short form of the mentalization scale (MentS-11)\: an evidence-based measure for Turkish adults(Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2026-03-03) Ünver, BuketThis study aimed to create a brief Turkish version of the Mentalization Scale (MentS-11) and to evaluate its reliability and validity in a large community sample. Turkish-speaking adults (N = 953) completed the original 25-item MentS, the Interactive Mentalization Questionnaire, and the Interpersonal Neurobiology–Based Prefrontal Cortex Functions Scale. Scale reduction combined exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses with graded-response item response theory. A three-factor solution—Self-related Mentalization (4 items), Other-related Mentalization (4 items), and Motivation to Mentalize (3 items)—displayed acceptable fit (CFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.08). Item-response analyses yielded strong discrimination (α = 0.93–2.07) and thresholds spanning the full latent range. Reliability was McDonald’s ωₜ = 0.84 for the total score, 0.81 for Other, 0.77 for Self, and 0.60 for Motivation. Scores on the MentS-11 were nearly identical to those on the 25-item form for the total scale (r =.92) and strongly aligned on their respective subscales (r =.72–0.81). Expected links with external measures confirmed convergent and criterion validity. The MentS-11 retains the theoretical scope and psychometric integrity of the original Turkish scale while halving administration time, making it a practical, time-efficient tool for assessing mentalization in both clinical practice and research.
