Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.advisorUmut, Önderen_US
dc.contributor.authorAbdi, Abdullahi Abdiazizen_US
dc.contributor.otherIşık Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, İnşaat Mühendisliği Yüksek Lisans Programıen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-10T17:25:30Z
dc.date.available2022-05-10T17:25:30Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-28
dc.identifier.citationAbdi, A. A. (2022). Comparative study for earthquake performance of steel buildings with seismic isolator and fixed based steel buildings with damper. İstanbul: Işık Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11729/4271
dc.descriptionText in English ; Abstract: English and Turkishen_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 116-118)en_US
dc.descriptionxx, 138 leavesen_US
dc.description.abstractEarthquake causes huge loss of lives and enormous damages to properties every year. In order to understand and avoid such damages, different types of seismic isolators have been used. To get the optimal and effective types of seismic isolators, a comparison study of three same-sized 12-storey steel buildings with conventional steel braced frames, and lead rubber bearing (LRB) fixed-based with fluid viscous dampers (FVD) is conducted and their seismic performance enhancements are evaluated using SAP2000 software. Researchers suggest that the seismic isolator building can survive seismic agitation behaviors such as uplifts, stress against ruptures, shears, cracking and displacements. In the study, three same-sized steel structures with different seismic isolator models, special moment and concentric moment frames of all three structures (SMF and SCBF) respectively, earthquake location (Kocaeli Turkey, Yarimca, 8/17/1999) have been selected, performing non-linear time history analysis, non-linear evaluation of dynamic behavioral building response spectrum analysis under load varying time function and design parameters are conducted. As a result of this study, conventional buildings, lead rubber bearing buildings and fluid viscous damper building storey displacement, inter-storey drifts, mode shape, shear force, axial force, base shear, and time history analysis for nonlinear dynamic structural responses are evaluated and compared with the conventional, lead rubber bearing and fluid viscous damper building, according to American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC 360-16).en_US
dc.description.abstractDeprem her yıl önemli can kayıplarına ve maddi hasarlara neden olmaktadır. Bu tür hasarları anlamak ve önlemek için yıllardır farklı tipte sismik izolatörler icat edilmiş ve mevcuttur. Optimum ve etkili sismik izolatör türlerini elde etmek için, geleneksel çelik çapraz çerçeveli üç adet aynı büyüklükteki 12 katlı çelik bina ve akışkan viskoz damperli (FVD) sabit tabanlı kurşun kauçuk mesnetli (LRB) bir karşılaştırma çalışması yapıldı ve sismik performans iyileştirmeleri SAP2000 yazılımı kullanılarak değerlendirilmektedir. Araştırmacılar, sismik izolatör binasının yükselmeler, yırtılmalara karşı stres, kesme, çatlama ve yer değiştirme gibi sismik ajitasyon davranışlarına dayanabileceğini öne sürüyorlar. Bu çalışmada bina seçim aşaması, yapısal sistemlerin (SMF ve SCBF) kararı, deprem yerinin seçimi (Kocaeli Türkiye, Yarımca, 8/17/1999), doğrusal olmayan zaman tanım alanı analizi yapılması, dinamik davranışın doğrusal olmayan değerlendirilmesi ele alınmaktadır. yük değişen zaman fonksiyonu ve tasarım parametreleri altında yapı tepki spektrumu analizi dikkate alınmıştır. Bu çalışmanın sonucunda, doğrusal olmayan dinamik yapısal tepkiler için konvansiyonel binalar, kurşun kauçuk taşıyan binalar ve akışkan viskoz sönümleyici bina kat deplasmanı, katlar arası ötelenmeler, mod şekli, kesme kuvveti, eksenel kuvvet, taban kesme ve zaman alanı analizleri değerlendirilmiştir. ve Amerikan Çelik Konstrüksiyon Enstitüsü'ne (AISC 360-16) göre geleneksel, kurşun kauçuk yataklı ve akışkan viskoz damper binası ile karşılaştırıldığında.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsConventional steel structureen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsLead rubber bearing isolation systemen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFluid viscous damperen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsObjectives of the studyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsMain scopeen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsOverview procedure/ Thesis outlineen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsNUMERICAL AND STRUCTURAL MODELING ANALYSISen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsBuilding descriptionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsBuilding framing and elevations 3D planen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSteel building detailing frames and sectionsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsMaterial propertyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsLoad combinationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSpecification, codes, and standards useden_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis optionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis option procedureen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsStructure and effectiveness of lead rubber bearing in seismic isolationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFluid viscous damper structure and efficacyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSteps for defining building models by using SAP2000 programen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsModel structural inputen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsModel rubber isolation system inputen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsModel fluid viscous damper system inputen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSteel design check inputen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of earthquakeen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsResponse spectrum analysisen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsResponse spectrum analysis – ASCE 7-16en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsGround motion dataen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSelection of ground motionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTime history analysis (Non-linear dynamic analysis)en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsProperties of non-linear plastic hinges (ASCE 41-06)en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsStructural component plastic hinges deformationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsPlastic deformation analysis guidelinesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDESIGN STRUCTURES PHASEen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDesign specifications (ASCE 7-16)en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDesign of the conventional steel buildingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDesign of the conventional steel building modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDesign of the conventional steel building drifts and strengthsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDesign of the lead rubber bearing isolation buildingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDesign of lead rubber bearing isolation building modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDesign of lead rubber bearing isolation building drifts and strengthsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDesign of the fluid viscous damper buildingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDesign of fluid viscous damper structure modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDesign of fluid viscous damper building drifts and strengthsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDisplacement and inter-drift analysis earthquake in the x-direction for fixedbase structureen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFixed base for the displacement analysis earthquake in the x-directionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFixed base for the inter-drift analysis earthquake in the x-directionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFixed base for the shear-force analysis in the x-direction earthquakeen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFixed base for the displacement and drift phase analysis earthquake in the ydirectionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFixed base for the displacement analysis earthquake in the y-directionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFixed base for the inter-drift analysis earthquake in the y-directionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFixed base shear-force for the analysis in the y-direction earthquakeen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTime period for the fixed base modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTime history analysis for the conventional structure modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDisplacement and velocity for (THA) in the x-direction for the conventional structure modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDisplacement and velocity for (THA) in the y-direction for the conventional structure modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcceleration for (THA) in the x-direction for the conventional structure modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcceleration for (THA) in the y-direction for the conventional structure modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsLead rubber bearing isolation system for the displacement and drift phase analysis earthquake in the x-directionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsLead rubber bearing displacement analysis earthquake in the xdirectionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsLead rubber bearing storey drift analysis earthquake in the x-directionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsShear force the analysis in the x-direction earthquake for the (LRB)en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsLead rubber bearing isolation system for the displacement and drift phase analysis earthquake in the y-directionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsLead rubber bearing isolation system displacement analysis earthquake for y-directionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsLead rubber bearing isolation system inter-drift analysis earthquake in the y-directionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsShear force the analysis in the y-direction earthquake for the lead rubber bearingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTime period for the lead rubber bearing isolation system modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTime history analysis for the (LRB) modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDisplacement and velocity time history analysis in x-direction for lead rubber bearing isolation system modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDisplacement and velocity time history analysis in y-direction for lead rubber bearing isolation system modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcceleration time history analysis in x-direction for lead rubber bearing isolation system modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcceleration time history analysis in y-direction for lead rubber bearing isolation system modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFluid viscous damper for the displacement and drift phase analysis earthquake in the x-directionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFluid viscous damper of the displacement analysis earthquake in the x-directionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFluid viscous damper of the storey drift analysis earthquake in the xdirectionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFluid viscous damper for the shear force analysis in the x-direction earthquakeen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFluid viscous damper for the displacement and drift phase analysis earthquake in the y-directionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFluid viscous damper of the displacement analysis earthquake in the y-directionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFluid viscous damper of the inter drift analysis earthquake in the ydirectionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFluid viscous damper for the shear force earthquake in the y-directionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTime period for the fluid viscous damper modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTime history analysis for the fluid viscous damper modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDisplacement and velocity (THA) in the x-direction for the fluid viscous damper modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDisplacement and velocity time history analysis in the y-direction for the fluid viscous damper modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcceleration (THA) in the x-direction for the fluid viscous damper modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcceleration (THA) in the y-direction for the fluid viscous damper modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsResults for case study building three system comparing modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsStorey displacement in the x-direction due to earthquake for the conventional structure, (LRB), and fluid viscous damperen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsStorey displacement in y-direction due to earthquake conventional structure, (LRB), and fluid viscous damperen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsStorey drift in the x-direction due to earthquake conventional structure, (LRB), and fluid viscous damperen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsStorey drift in the y-direction due to earthquake conventional structure, (LRB), and fluid viscous damperen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTime period for the conventional structure, (LRB), and (FVD)en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsBase Shear for the conventional structure, (LRB), and (FVD)en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsStiffness models for the conventional structure, (LRB), and (FVD)en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsComparing results of dampers for building structure systems with lead rubber bearing (LRB) and fluid viscous damper (FVD)en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsStorey drift in the x-direction due to earthquake for (LRB) and (FVD)en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsStorey drift in the y-direction due to earthquake for lead rubber bearing and fluid viscous damperen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAxial-force in the exterior columns for comparing with the lead rubber bearing and fluid viscous damperen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAxial-force in the interior columns for comparing with the lead rubber bearing and fluid viscous damperen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsShear force in the beams for the comparing with the lead rubber bearing and fluid viscous damperen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsShear force in the exterior column for comparing with the lead rubber bearing and fluid viscous damperen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsShear force in the interior column for comparing with the (LRB) and (FVD)en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIşık Üniversitesien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectLead rubber bearingen_US
dc.subjectConventional structureen_US
dc.subjectFluid viscous damperen_US
dc.subjectFixed baseen_US
dc.subjectResponse spectrumen_US
dc.subjectNonlinear time history analysisen_US
dc.subjectSAP2000en_US
dc.subjectKurşun kauçuk yataken_US
dc.subjectKonvansiyonel yapıen_US
dc.subjectAkışkan viskoz sönümleyicien_US
dc.subjectSabit tabanen_US
dc.subjectTepki spektrumu ve doğrusal olmayan zaman alanı analizien_US
dc.subject.lccTA684 .A23 2022
dc.subject.lcshBuilding, Iron and steel -- Earthquake effects.en_US
dc.subject.lcshEarthquake resistant design.en_US
dc.subject.lcshBuildings -- Earthquake effects.en_US
dc.titleComparative study for earthquake performance of steel buildings with seismic isolator and fixed based steel buildings with damperen_US
dc.title.alternativeSSMK Zolatörlü çelik binalar ve damperli sabit esaslı çelik binaların deprem performanslarının karşılaştırmalı çalışmasıen_US
dc.typeMaster Thesisen_US
dc.departmentIşık Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, İnşaat Mühendisliği Yüksek Lisans Programıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-9375-3498
dc.authorid0000-0001-9375-3498en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryTezen_US
dc.institutionauthorAbdi, Abdullahi Abdiazizen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess